A Peer Review is explanations of all the different theories compared - then maybe a conclusion which i came up with? Please check this one.

A Peer Review is explanations of all the different theories compared - then maybe a conclusion which i came up with? Please check this one.


Peer Review:


The main theory throughout the world before the Big Bang was not too clear, some people argued that the universe was created directly as it is today. While other philosophies argued that the universe was existent forever without a beginning. The Big Bang theory gave another understanding of the universe and argued that the universe began from one area and began to expand from there, into the universe which we have existent today. This has been discussed earlier on, so i will try to discuss the other theories put forward.



Some people say that the universe around us was created in the form it is today. They believe that this is how the universe began, and was created by God. They argue that the universe only came into existence by an Originator, and that it is kept in order and being sustained for such a long period of time, and that this is why they believe that it is in the control of God. This is also known as the 'Creationist' theory, although creationists do have a wide range of opinions.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wic.html



Some Philosophers throughout the times tried to argue that the universe had been existent eternally without a beginning. They claimed that it was infinite, but weren't really able to give a full scientific explanation for it. This started off with the likes of Aristotle, and certain people throughout the times have believed in this theory. This could not be proven nor disproven, but when Edwin Hubble theorised the Big Bang and argued that the universe was expanding from a central point - the view of the universe being eternal did not remain too strong.

The Big Bang is the strongest theory among the mainstream today, and may well remain this way for quite a while.


http://www.egs.edu/resources/aristotle.html




The study of Edwin Hubble has disproved those who believe in an eternal universe, it has also given a better explanation to how the universe may have started - and how it has reached the state it is in today. Some will argue that the universe has gone through a process of eternal contractions and Big Bangs , however - this goes into metaphysics and therefore requires faith - therefore this is not science and cannot be proven or disproven. But since science is based on proof and evidences, this theory cannot be scientific.


Then there are some who believe that the Big Bang was caused by a Perfect, Flawless and Wise Originator. They believe in Him as God, who is Eternal and outside of His creation, He is controlling the affairs of the universe and sustaining it. They believe that this requires faith, but they know that this belief joins all the missing jigsaw pieces to the missing answers for all the questions which have been asked. Some may question who created this God - the response to this is that God is Perfect in every way, He is not like His creation - who are dependant upon others - His Perfection implies His Lordship (one who is Perfect cannot be created since that would imply that they are dependant upon another), and this is why we take Him as a God, and this is why we believe in Him.